Racism in our housing system
Racism can be obvious or harder to recognise, but one thing we know is that it is widespread in the housing system.
Why the fight for home is a fight against racism
We believe that everybody should have the right to access and live in a safe, secure home. But evidence shows that this isn’t a reality for everyone.
The housing emergency affects people across the whole of society, but we know that People of Colour ─ particularly Black communities ─ are hit hardest.
They are disproportionately more likely to be made homeless, live in deprived neighbourhoods and poor-quality homes. This is because of historical inequities, modern policies and systemic racism.

This chart shows the proportion of households in the general population and the proportion in temporary accommodation, broken down by ethnicity. Though Black-led¹ households make up just 4% of households in the general population, they make up 23% of households in temporary accommodation.
Racism impacts people in every part of the housing system
The housing system includes the laws, policies, organisations, and economic factors that shape how homes are built, let, managed and regulated.
At every stage of navigating this system ─ whether dealing with unaffordable rents, unsafe conditions, overcrowding, lack of rights, or discriminatory treatment from housing professionals (such as landlords and local authority housing staff) ─ racism can affect people’s experiences and outcomes.
Homelessness
Black-led households face the highest rates of homelessness. They are almost 13 times more likely² to be stuck in temporary accommodation than White-led households.
Disrepair and poor conditions
Among renters, People of Colour are 51% more likely to have put up with poor conditions (such as leaks or pests) to be able to rent their home.³
They are also 22% more likely to have experienced damp or mould in the last year compared to White British/Irish renters.³
Direct discrimination
Among renters, People of Colour are 87% more likely to have experienced illegal acts⁴ by their landlord in the last year compared to White British/Irish renters.³
One third (32%) of Black people with experience of homelessness reported discrimination from a social or private landlord.
Problems affording a home
People of Colour are more likely than White people to face persistently low incomes after housing costs. Bangladeshi and Black families are most likely to need housing benefit to help cover the cost of housing.
The shortage of genuinely affordable homes increases the risk of overcrowding ─ which is highest among Arab, Bangladeshi, Black African, and Mixed White and Black African households.
'I felt like I was being pushed to the back of the queue [for housing support]. It was a very bad experience and I couldn't help but wonder if my "race" was playing a role in how my application was being handled.'
- Interviewee
Political decisions that affect all renters, but particularly disadvantage People of Colour
Lack of social homes
Decades of underinvestment mean not enough social homes are being built. This has a larger impact on People of Colour, particularly Black communities, because they are more likely to be homeless than White-led households, or living in unsafe or unaffordable homes.Inadequate housing benefit
As some Communities of Colour are more likely to need housing benefit to help cover the cost of housing, inadequate housing benefit impacts them more.Lack of renters’ rights
People of Colour are more likely to privately rent their home than those in White British-led households, leaving them affected by inadequate protections against discrimination and unfair rent hikes.
Modern policies designed to create a hostile environment for migrants create additional barriers for all People of Colour trying to access a safe and decent home. For example:
1. Right to Rent
Right to Rent rules require landlords to check prospective renters’ immigration status before agreeing to a tenancy. If a landlord is found to be letting to someone without the right to rent, they could face a fine of up to £20,000 or five years in prison.
This means that some People of Colour struggle to access a home, even if they are British-born or have the legal right to rent. Research has found that the policy pushes landlords towards declining any prospective tenant without a UK passport, encouraging racist assumptions about migration status.
2. No recourse to public funds
Thousands of people, including families, have immigration conditions that give them no recourse to public funds, meaning they can’t access housing benefit, or receive homelessness assistance from the council.
We know that a safe home is essential for a decent life, yet this policy leaves people ─ including families ─ vulnerable to poverty, overcrowded housing, exploitation and, in the worst cases, homelessness and destitution.

‘[You're] always assumed and treated as someone who belongs somewhere else.’
- Interviewee
Structural racism and historical policies that have made racism systemic
Historical legal and policy decisions, like the ones listed below, have disadvantaged People of Colour and migrants in particular. Research shows the negative impact this had, and continues to have, on People of Colour’s access to a safe and secure home.
Post-war period (1940s–1960s): racial steering and restrictive allocation rules
From the mid-20th century, racial steering by social housing providers meant that People of Colour were routinely placed away from White communities and into less desirable, under-resourced areas.
At the same time, restrictive allocation policies emerged. Local residence requirements, introduced between the 1940s and 1960s, meant that applicants had to live in an area for a set period before qualifying for a social home there. These rules particularly affected newly arrived migrants from former colonies, who were increasingly differentiated according to their country of origin, immigration status, and associated rights.
1970s–1990s: ongoing racial discrimination in access to housing
Through the 1970s, discriminatory practices continued to affect migrants and People of Colour. Many faced racist treatment from letting agents when trying to access good-quality rented homes and, as a result, were more likely to end up in poor-quality accommodation and vulnerable to exploitation by ‘slum’ landlords, such as the notorious Peter Rachman.
Through the 1980s and 1990s, several investigations also uncovered that some local authorities used racist allocation practices, including offering People of Colour poorer-quality properties or making it harder for them to be rehoused.
1980s onwards:
Immigration controls and exclusion from housing registers
Immigration status became increasingly linked to the right to access public funds. By the 1990s, it became a statutory requirement to exclude people seeking asylum and those subject to immigration controls from social housing registers, further limiting access for many People of Colour.
The Right to Buy era
Meanwhile, the introduction of the Right to Buy policy in the 1980s reduced the social housing stock without sufficient replacement. People of Colour were also less likely than White households to have the income needed to purchase their own homes, leaving them more affected by the shrinking supply of social housing.
Community responses and positive developments
In response to systemic exclusion, Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) housing associations emerged to challenge mainstream discrimination. Some continue today, though others have struggled to remain financially viable.
This legacy of historic policies continues to impact Black and Black Mixed heritage households today as they navigate a housing system that has long been shaped by exclusionary practices.
My colour speaks before me
Our research report 'My colour speaks before me' shows that Black and Black Mixed heritage people continue to face racism when trying to access social housing. Urgent action is needed to tackle this deep-rooted problem.
Anti-racism means not just rejecting racism but actively challenging the structures that create racial inequality ─ promoting fairness and inclusion for everyone. That’s why we must stand together to campaign for anti-racism to be built into the core of the housing system.
Explore the campaign
Related blogs
Don't give up: Tracy's story
This is our house, our family home for 52 years. When my son was taken, my faith, my family, my Jamaican half and my heart made it to him…Read on
Right to Rent: entrenching discrimination in the private rented sector
Right to Rent, introduced as part of the Immigration Act of 2014...Read on
Awaab’s Law finally begins to take effect
They’d reported the mould back in 2017, before Awaab was born. The advice given by their landlord was to "paint over it"...Read on
We're committed to being an anti-racist organisation
As leaders in the housing and homelessness sector, we cannot allow the legacy of systemic racism to be one of rising homelessness, unfit and unsafe housing. So the fight against racism is fundamental to our purpose of defending the right to a safe home.
Explore our commitmentsResources
Words on this page
People of Colour (or PoC)
This is a term used to refer to anyone who does not identify as White.
Structural racism
A system in which public policies, institutional practices and cultural representations reinforce ways to perpetuate racial inequity. It includes dimensions of history and culture that have allowed privileges associated with ‘Whiteness’ and disadvantages associated with ‘People of Colour’ to endure and adapt over time.
Structural racism is not something that a few people or institutions choose to practice. Instead, it has been and still is a feature of the social, economic and political systems in which we all exist.
Systemic racism
This refers to the way racism is built into every level of our society. One difference between the terms is that structural racism analysis pays more attention to the historical, cultural and social psychological aspects of our currently racialised society. Systemic racism refers to the way racism is built right into every level of our society.
Anti-racism
This is the proactive dismantling of systemic racism and racist policies underpinning the White privileged society in which we exist. It addresses the specific harm and impact of racism on all racially marginalised communities and proposes equality of outcome, not just opportunity.
For Shelter, this means recognising how race directly impacts the experience and outcomes of our staff and clients, whether positively or negatively, and acknowledging the role power plays, who has it and how it's used.
Evidence on this page
We refer to ‘Black-led households’ rather than Black households because the ethnicity of the lead applicant may be different to other members of the household.
'More likely to be homeless’ means some groups of people are more likely to experience homelessness when compared to their percentage of the overall population. For example, Black-led households make up 4% of households in the general population, but 23% of households in temporary accommodation. This means Black-led households are overrepresented in temporary accommodation. Source: Statutory homelessness in England: April to June 2025 - GOV.UK
Shelter/Yougov survey of 4,023 private renting adults (18+) in England, 2023.
Private renters experiencing illegal acts has been defined as those who said they have experienced at least one of the following:
my landlord/letting agent cut off my electricity/gas/water for no good reason. My landlord/letting agent has entered my home without giving any notice/a chance for me to give permission. My landlord/letting agent has stolen or damaged my personal belongings or possessions. I have paid a tenancy/damage deposit to a landlord or agent and they have not placed the deposit with any of the approved government protection schemes. I have been removed from a private rented home without being given the proper notice period and/or without the correct procedures being followed by the private landlord/letting agent. I have experienced threatening behaviour, harassment or assault by my private landlord or letting agent. Essential safety or household appliances/amenities were not working when I moved into a property (e.g. broken fire or smoke alarm, water or central heating not working). I have been treated unfairly by a landlord/letting agent due to my race/age/nationality/gender/sexual orientation/disability.
Share this page
The more people that our information reaches, the greater our chance of creating real social change. Can you share this with friends or family?

