Appeals against a possession order
An appeal against a possession order can usually be made only on a point of law and after getting a court’s permission to appeal.
Appeals in possession cases
An appeal against a possession order normally has to be made within 21 days of the date the order was made. An appeal can normally be brought only on a point of law. The rules governing appeals are set out in Civil Procedure Rule (CPR) 52. There is usually a court fee to pay and costs involved in obtaining the supporting documents required such as the transcript of the hearing.
Which court will hear the appeal
Most possession orders are made in the County Court by a district judge. An appeal is made to the circuit judge (also at County Court level, though a circuit judge may cover a number of different County Courts).
An appeal against the decision of a circuit judge is to be made to the Court of Appeal in a case tried on the multi-track or to the High Court in a case tried on the fast track.
Applying for permission to appeal
Permission to appeal can be sought from the judge at the possession hearing, or if this is refused, by an application to the court which would hear any appeal. Alternatively, an application for permission can be made directly to the appeal court.
The first step is to complete Form N161, which is an application for permission to appeal. There are detailed guidance notes accompanying the form to assist in its completion. It details the options available and lists the supporting documents required.
Permission to appeal will normally only be given where there is a good prospect of success. In addition, the person appealing needs to be able to provide all the supporting documents, including copy of the possession order appealed against and an approved transcript of the relevant court hearing. The latter can sometimes been obtained at public expense, however, the court is entitled to refuse to provide it at public expenses where it considers that the appeal has not a good prospect of success. There is no right of appeal against a decision of an appellate court to give or refuse permission to appeal and the only remedy available in such cases is to apply for judicial review where exceptional circumstances warrant such application.
There is no automatic right to introduce new points on appeal. The appellate court will not admit new evidence, unless it exercises its discretion to do so and the decision would depend on the analysis of relevant factors, such as whether the original decision was made at a trial or at a short summary hearing, the nature of the new point and whether the opposing party would suffer prejudice as a result.
In deciding whether to allow fresh evidence to be introduced, the court can apply the three stage test set down by the Court of Appeal:
the evidence could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence in time for the hearing or trial
if available, the evidence would have had an important influence on the case
the evidence must be credible
The Court of Appeal applied this test in a case where a mistake of the court led to an appeal being dismissed as out of time.
If the appeal is successful the court can set the order aside or, where possession was made on a discretionary ground, vary the order. For more information see Setting aside a possession order and Varying or postponing a possession order.
Reopening of final appeals
In some exceptional cases, for example when the original possession order was made without the county court considering the Article 8 rights of the occupier despite such a defence having been raised during the possession proceedings (see Public law and human rights defences for more on Article 8), it may be possible to apply to reopen an appeal to the Court of Appeal or the High Court, but only if all the following conditions are satisfied:
it is necessary to do so in order to avoid real injustice
the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to reopen the appeal, and
there is no alternative effective remedy
Last updated: 27 May 2021
Ismail and another v Genesis Housing Association  EWHC 1591 (QB).
s.54(4) Access to Justice Act 1999; Sivasubramaniam v Wandsworth County Court  EWCA Civ 1738; R (on the application of Tummond) v Reading County Court and another  EWHC 1039 (Admin).
Notting Hill Finance Ltd v Sheikh  EWCA Civ 1337; see also Singh v Dass  EWCA Civ 360.
Ladd v Marshall  3 All ER 745.
Mohammed Araho v Southwark London Borough Council  EWHC 2633 (QB).
CPR 52.17 and PD 52A; (1) Lawal (2) Lawal v Circle 33 Housing Trust  EWCA Civ 1514.