Skip to main content
Shelter Logo
England

Permission for company directors in a DRO

A debtor must apply for permission to be the director of a limited company when subject to a debt relief order.

This content applies to England & Wales

Prohibition against acting as a director

Once a debt relief order application is approved, the debtor must apply for the court's permission before they can:[1]

  • be formally appointed as a director of a company

  • continue to act as a director of a company

  • directly or indirectly take part in the promotion, formation, or management of a company

Failure to obtain permission from the court before taking any of the prohibited steps is a criminal offence.

The debtor must terminate their appointment and cease all relevant activities before they apply for a DRO.

Scope of the prohibition

The prohibition applies to debtors appointed as a company director, including people who are inactive in their roles.

The prohibition has a wider application than banning debtors from being formally appointed as a company director. Any activity that could include taking part in or being concerned with a company's management is included.[2]

This means the debtor must not arrange for another person to manage the company on their behalf or upon their instructions.

When the prohibition applies

The prohibition applies during the debt relief order moratorium.[3]

It also applies to debtors subject to a debt relief restrictions undertaking or order, including an interim order.[4]

Termination of director appointment

The debtor must terminate their appointment as a director and cease any activity that could amount to a breach of the prohibition before the debt relief order application is approved.

Companies House form TM01 terminates a director's appointment. It can be filed by post or online.

The debtor can apply to court for permission to become a director once the debt relief order application is approved.

Impact on livelihood

The debtor cannot revoke the debt relief order if the application for permission is refused. Debtors whose livelihood depends on obtaining the court's permission to run a company should consider other debt options.

People who are not formally appointed directors

Debtors acting in the formation or management of a company but who are not officially named as directors should stop their activities as soon as the debt relief order application is submitted.

That way they can ensure they are not continuing the activities at the point the application is approved.

When the debtor can resume director duties

A person who has ceased to be a director can resume their duties once the DRO moratorium has ended. The debtor should check the official receiver has not extended the moratorium period beyond 12 months before they resume director duties.

If a debt relief restrictions order or undertaking has been imposed, the debtor must wait until it has expired before resuming director duties. A debt relief restrictions order or undertaking can last between 2 and 15 years.

Read more about Debt relief restrictions orders and undertakings on Shelter Legal.

Debtor's application for permission

A debtor already acting as a director must apply to court for permission to continue at the point when:[5]

  • the debt relief order application is approved

  • a debt relief restrictions order or undertaking is made

People who want to start acting as a director during a debt relief order moratorium or debt relief restrictions must apply to court before they begin.

The debtor cannot apply for permission until they are in a moratorium or subject to debt relief restrictions.

The application for permission is not a mere formality. The court examines all the circumstances of the case. There is a significant risk permission will be refused, especially if the official receiver opposes the application.

How the debtor makes the application

The debtor applies to court for permission on form IAA (the general insolvency application form).

The form must be accompanied by a witness statement from the debtor which specifies:[6]

  • the name of the company

  • the nature of the business

  • the place or places where the business operates

  • whether it is a private or public company

  • names of all the people who are directors or managers

  • how the applicant will be involved in the formation, promotion, or management of the company

  • the income and benefits the applicant will receive from the directorship

Read more about witness statements on Shelter Legal.

Where the debtor makes the application

The debtor must make their application for permission to the hearing centre that serves their insolvency district.[7]

Cost to make the application

The cost to make an application is £308.[8]

The debtor might qualify for a fee remission if their household income is low. Information about help with court fees is available on Gov.uk.

How the court deals with the application

Once the court receives the application it must set a hearing and deliver notice of the hearing to the debtor.[9]

The court considers all the facts of the case to reach a decision on whether to allow the debtor permission to be a director. It will take into account the conduct of the debtor and the risk to the public if the debtor is permitted to run a company.[10]

Consequences of failure to get permission

A debtor who is still a director of a company when a debt relief order is approved, or debt relief restrictions are imposed, is committing a criminal offence.

This applies if they are inactive in running the company, or if an application for permission is pending.

Punishment and liability for the debtor

The offence is punishable by a fine, or a prison sentence of up to two years, or both.[11]

In addition, the debtor is personally liable for all the relevant debt of the company.[12]

Defences against conviction

A breach of the prohibition is a strict liability offence.

That means the debtor is guilty whether they were aware of the rules or not.[13] There is no defence of innocent intention.

The court has the power to grant retrospective permission. Case law suggests it is unlikely to grant permission after the fact except in extreme cases.[14]

Last updated: 26 June 2024

Footnotes

  • [1]

    s.11 Company Director Disqualification Act 1986 (as extended by s.108 Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and Schedule 20.

  • [2]

    see R v Campbell (1984) 78 Cr App Rep 95, Beldam J, at 95- 101 interpreting s.188 of the Companies Act 1948 which shared the wording of s.11 Company Director Disqualification Act 1986 ’be concerned in’ and ’taking part in’.

  • [3]

    s.11(2)(d) Company Director Disqualification Act 1986.

  • [4]

    para 5(4)(a) Sch 4ZB, Insolvency Act 1986.

  • [5]

    r. 9.25(1) of the Insolvency Rules (England and Wales) 2016.

  • [6]

    rule 9.25 Insolvency Rules 2016.

  • [7]

    rule 9.22 (1) Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

  • [8]

    Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008 as amended by schedule 4, The Court and Tribunal Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2024.

  • [9]

    rule 9.25 Insolvency Rules 2016.

  • [10]

    See Chapter 6 Permission to act as director or in management where disqualification arises otherwise than under a disqualification order or undertaking for commentary; Mithani's: Directors Disqualification, LexisNexis.

  • [11]

    s.13 (a) Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.

  • [12]

    s.15 (1) Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.

  • [13]

    R v Brockley [1994] 1 BCLC 606, [1994] BCC 131, CA. See also R v Doring [2002] EWCA Crim 1695, [2003] 1 Cr App Rep 143.

  • [14]

    Re Soiram Ltd and Mezzanine Group plc (No 2), Georgallides v Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy [2020] EWHC 768 (Ch).