Excluded occupiers

The main categories of excluded occupiers and how a contract can be ended by giving notice or by eviction.

This content applies to England

Categories of excluded occupier

Most of the categories of excluded occupiers are set out in the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.[1]

Resident landlord with shared accommodation

Shared accommodation includes any room such as a kitchen, living room or bathroom but excludes storage areas, stairways and hallways.[2] A person can be an excluded occupier in the two cases below.

In either case, if the landlord moves out of the premises at any point, and does not have an intention to return, then the occupancy ceases to be excluded and an assured shorthold tenancy or regulated tenancy may arise.[3] If it does, then that tenancy continues to retain its status even if the landlord moves back.

Sharing accommodation with a resident landlord

The occupier can be excluded if the accommodation is shared with a resident landlord.

To qualify as a resident landlord of an excluded occupier, the landlord must live in the same premises of which the whole or part of the shared accommodation with the occupier forms part, and have occupied the premises as their only or principal home both at the outset of the occupancy agreement and at the time it comes to an end.[4]

If there are two or more joint landlords, one of them living in the same building as the occupier qualifies as a resident landlord.[5]

See Who has basic protection for information on the situation where an occupier has a resident landlord but does not share accommodation with that landlord.

Sharing accommodation with resident landlord's family member

The occupier can be excluded also if the accommodation (defined as above) shared is with a family member of the resident landlord.[6]

For the occupier to be excluded it is necessary that the:

  • landlord's family member must have occupied the same premises of which the whole or part of the shared accommodation with the occupier forms part, and have occupied the premises as their only or principal home both at the outset of the occupancy agreement and at the time it comes to an end, and

  • landlord must live in the same premises of which the whole or part of the shared accommodation between their family member and the occupier forms part, and have occupied the premises as their only or principal home both at the outset of the occupancy agreement and at the time it comes to an end

The meaning of family is the same as that in section 113 of the Housing Act 1985 and includes: spouses, civil partners, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nephews, and nieces.[7]

Occupancy agreement granted to trespassers

This covers temporary arrangements granted to people who entered the premises as trespassers.[8]

For example, it covers the situation where a landlord discovers a squatter in their premises and allows the squatter to stay on a temporary basis, paying a weekly fee or rent until the landlord needs possession.

Holiday lets

This covers tenancies and licences that are genuinely granted for the duration of a holiday.[9]

Certain agreements may be labelled 'holiday lets' but are a sham that does not reflect the reality of the situation.

Rent-free accommodation

This covers occupiers who have no obligation to pay rent and are not obliged to carry out other services in lieu of rent.[10] This could include situations where accommodation is provided by relatives.

The courts have held that an undertaking by the occupier to keep a property repaired and insured was sufficient to be a payment for money or 'money's worth' (services in lieu of rent).[11] However, an agreement to pay nothing but fuel and food bills was not.[12]

An occupier, who lives in rent-free accommodation owned by their employer and who receives lower wages in return for this, is treated as paying money's worth and is not an excluded occupier under this heading.

Accommodation for asylum seekers

This covers tenancies or licences granted to asylum seekers in order to provide accommodation under Part 6 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999,[13] and includes accommodation with private landlords provided by the UKVI.

The tenancy or license is not excluded where accommodation is granted to an asylum seeker outside these provisions.

Licences in public sector hostels

A hostel means a building in which the accommodation provided is not separate and self-contained and either board and/or facilities for the preparation of food is provided for residents.[14]

Public bodies who can grant excluded licences include:[15]

  • local authorities

  • development corporations

  • the Commission for New Towns (abolished 1 April 2009)

  • Housing Action Trusts

  • private registered providers of social housing

  • other public bodies authorised, from time to time, by the Secretary of State to grant licences in hostels

  • charitable housing trusts

A charitable housing trust might not be registered as a private registered provider or registered social landlord. In these cases it will be necessary to check the trust deed that set up the charity and/or check its accounts to see how its funds are in fact used, in order to establish if an organisation can be classed as a charitable housing trust.

Home Office 'no right to rent' notice

This covers situations where the Home Office serves a disqualification from renting notice (under section 33D(2) of the Immigration Act 2014) on the landlord naming all of the occupiers in the premises.

In this situation, an assured tenancy, Rent Act protected tenancy or tenancy with basic protection is converted into an excluded tenancy.[16]

Accommodation licensed to homeless applicants

This category is not included in section 3A of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

The courts have held that homeless applicants are not subject to protection under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 when granted a licence to occupy accommodation under the following sections of the Housing Act 1996:[17]

  • section 188 (accommodation pending inquiries)

  • section 190 (duties to an applicant who has been found intentionally homeless)

Temporary accommodation includes self-contained accommodation.[18]

See Who has basic protection? for information about whether a tenancy granted to a homeless applicant under these provisions would be protected under Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

The Supreme Court has held that this is not inconsistent with an occupier's rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.[19]

Exception: certain pre-15 January 1989 tenancies

A tenant who falls into one of the excluded categories will not be an excluded occupier if their tenancy agreement began before 15 January 1989, and there has been no rent increase or substantial variation of the terms of the tenancy on or after that date.

This is because section 3A of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 did not come into effect until 15 January 1989.

This does not apply to any licensee whose agreement began before 15 January 1989.

Ending the tenancy – notice from landlord

Excluded tenancies or licences may be terminated by contractual notice, or, where an agreement does not include information on ending the contract, common law principles as to notice (served by either the landlord or the tenant) will apply.

Notice where all occupiers have no 'right to rent'

Where an assured, Rent Act protected or basic protected tenancy has been converted to an excluded tenancy following a Home Office 'no right to rent' notice, the landlord can serve a minimum of 28 days' notice (on a prescribed form) to terminate the tenancy. No court order is required.

Notice from occupier

If an excluded occupier wants to leave, the steps they must take depend on whether they have a fixed-term or periodic agreement and whether they have a tenancy or a licence.

Eviction of an excluded occupier

At the end of the notice period (or when the fixed term ends) the landlord can lawfully evict the occupier without the need to obtain a court order.[20]

If an excluded occupier remains in the property after the appropriate notice given by the landlord has expired, the landlord can physically take possession. For example, the landlord could change the locks while the occupier is out or may take the occupier's belongings and put them outside the property in order to persuade the occupier to leave the accommodation.

However, if the landlord evicts without getting a court order, they run the risk of committing an offence under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Under section 6 of this Act, an offence is committed if violence is used or threatened to secure entry to premises when there is someone present on those premises opposed to the entry.

Last updated: 8 April 2021

Footnotes

  • [1]

    s.3A Protection From Eviction Act 1977, as amended.

  • [2]

    s.3A(4) and s.3A(5) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [3]

    para 10, Sch. 1 Housing Act 1988; s.12 Rent Act 1977.

  • [4]

    s.3(2) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [5]

    Cooper v Tait (1984) 15 HLR 98, CA.

  • [6]

    s.3(3) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [7]

    s.3A(5) Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and s.113 Housing Act 1985, as amended by Sch.8 Civil Partnership Act 2004.

  • [8]

    s.3A(6) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [9]

    s.3A(7)(a) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [10]

    s.3A(7)(b) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [11]

    Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason [2007] EWHC 1088 (Ch).

  • [12]

    West Wiltshire DC v Snelgrove (1998) 30 HLR 57.

  • [13]

    s.7A Protection From Eviction Act 1977 as inserted by Sch.14 Immigration and Asylum Act 1999.

  • [14]

    s.622 Housing Act 1985.

  • [15]

    s.3A(8) Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

  • [16]

    s.3A(7D) Protection from Eviction Act 1977 inserted by s.40(5) Immigration Act 2016 (in force with effect from 1 December 2016).

  • [17]

    R (on the application of ZH and CN) v Newham LBC and Lewisham LBC and Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] UKSC 62; Desnousse v (1) Newham LBC (2) Paddington Churches HA (3) Veni Properties Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 547; Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC (1995) 27 HLR 439, CA; Huda v Redbridge LBC [2016] EWCA Civ 709.

  • [18]

    Desnousse v (1) Newham LBC (2) Paddington Churches HA (3) Veni Properties Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 547.

  • [19]

    R (on the application of ZH and CN) v Newham LBC and Lewisham LBC and Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] UKSC 62.

  • [20]

    ss.3 and 3A Protection from Eviction Act 1977.