Skip to main content
Shelter Logo
England

Right to an internal review of a homelessness decision

When an applicant has the right to ask for an internal review of a homelessness decision.

This content applies to England

Right to internal review

Applicants have a right to request an internal review of most local authority homelessness decisions.[1] The review is carried out by the authority that made the decision, which should follow a specific procedure.

There is no statutory right to a second review of an original decision or to a review of a decision made on review although local authorities may exercise discretion to carry out either.[2]

Which decisions can be reviewed

The key local authority decisions that can be reviewed are:

  • whether the applicant is eligible for assistance, homeless, in priority need, intentionally homeless or has a local connection, and therefore what duty the authority owes[3]

  • what steps the authority is to take in order to prevent or relieve homelessness, which includes having regard to the assessment of the applicant's case in the personalised housing plan[4]

  • to end either the prevention or relief duty[5]

  • to notify the applicant that they have deliberately and unreasonably refused to cooperate with the authority[6]

  • a notification that a local authority is going to make or has made a referral to another authority (before a decision has been made on whether the referral is successful) where this is made at the stage of main housing duty[7]

  • the decision made on whether a referral to another authority is successful, whether this decision is made at the stage of relief or main housing duty [8]

  • the suitability of accommodation  provided in discharge of the local authority's duties under Part 7 (ie while duties subsist) and offered in order to end duties.[9] The applicant may either accept or reject the offer and in either case still request a review.[10] Note that this right does not extend to a review of the suitability of interim accommodation.

  • whether a duty has been discharged towards the applicant[11]

Decisions not subject to internal review

The most important decisions that are not subject to internal review are:

  • a refusal to accept a homelessness application

  • a challenge based on the length of time in accommodation to provided to people who are in priority need but intentionally homeless

  • the suitability of interim accommodation

  • the assessment of need and the content of the personalised housing plan (but an applicant has a right to request a review of the steps the authority is to take to prevent or relieve homelessness, as above)

  • a decision not to provide accommodation pending a review

  • decisions about the protection of property

  • a refusal to accept an out of time review or to carry out a discretionary second review

These decisions can be challenged by judicial review.

Last updated: 19 March 2021

Footnotes

  • [1]

    s.202 Housing Act 1996.

  • [2]

    s.202(2) Housing Act 1996; R(B) v Redbridge LBC ex p B [2019] EWHC 250.

  • [3]

    s.202(1)(b) Housing Act 1996 as amended by s.9(2) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [4]

    s.202(1)(ba)(i) and (bc)(i) Housing Act 1996 as inserted by s.9(2) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [5]

    s.202(1)(ba)(ii) and (bc)(ii) Housing Act 1996 as inserted by s.9(2) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [6]

    s.202(1)(bb) Housing Act 1996 as inserted by s.9(2) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [7]

    s.202(1)(c) Housing Act 1996.

  • [8]

    s.202(1)(d) Housing Act 1996.

  • [9]

    s.202(1)(f) and (g) Housing Act 1996 and s.202(1)(h) Housing Act 1996 as inserted by s.9(2)(d) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [10]

    s.202(1B) Housing Act 1996 as inserted by s.9(2) Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.

  • [11]

    Ravichandran & Anor v Lewisham LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 755.